My Twitter

Thursday, October 29, 2009

GDP up 3.2% in 3rd Quarter

...and we still have $589 trillion worth of derivatives in the market - that ticking time bomb that set off the first collapse. Structurally the financial system is still the same recipe for disaster as it was a year ago. We just prolonged the meltdown, and it is going to come. Why is our GDP up? Well to be honest, I would be astounded if it wasn't after the trillions and trillions the Fed has been pumping into the economy. But like a little puff of air to keep a balloon up, the trend is still downward and it is going to crash once all the air is gone (or worthless in our case).

RGDP is calculated from 4 components, Consumer Spending, Investment, Net Exports and Government Spending (RGDP = Y = C + I + G + NX). Well we know that C is down, and so is I. NX has been negative for decades, so how is it possible that the GDP is up? Well its that enormous G (government spending). When you have to rely on your government to keep GDP up, you've got a SERIOUS problem with your economy. And I thought we were screwed when C was the only thing keeping our economy moving (70% based for a while now). Now that 70% is likely to go down, and government spending could easily reach 40 or even 50% of our GDP. I fear that we may even reach 100% one day.

Do not believe the hype about the "recovery" it's all phony and not based on real economics!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

How about that WVU Win!

I love how ESPN's ranking puts us at 24 but why have the others not even ranked us? We are 3-0 and yet there are still so many teams that are 2-1 that are above us. Well, I think I have an answer to that question but first I'd like to say that I think we've got great potential this year. Our team has been starting out slowly (have you noticed this?) nearly every game. But like a big freight train once we get going it's hard to stop us. I think I like this strategy much better as it will take some of the bigger teams off of their feet. With their team starting out with a pretty commanding lead, then before they know it we are coming up in the lead at very fast rates.

But I don't know what to say about our defense. While we had 5 interceptions last week, at the same time we also let nearly 500 yards go. I think we've got a great defense, Auburn has always had a great defense, but I think we've got to have more yards than the other team every game. Next week I hope we see this. If we are going to do well against some of these teams we have to have a tried and true defense that stops yards and doesn't miss tackles. When we get into the back field we have to get the QB and not let him squirm around for 5 minutes.

Sure you might be saying, what's your point we won last week despite all of these faults? Sure we won, we won because the other team made more mistakes than we did (the reason all teams win or lose). Frankly, we got lucky. We cannot rely on luck and be considered a good team. And that is the reason why we are not ranked above 25.

Our win next Saturday over Ball State will certainly put us on the map, but I hope it is not on luck that we are relying. However, looking forward I'm not certain whether we should be worried about Tennessee or not. I wasn't able to see that game but from the looks of it (just by looking at the score) it looks as though Florida struggled a bit. If the #1 team in the nation is struggling then we may have some problems. I will certainly take a look at Tennessee's game vs. Ohio next Saturday though.

1 Comments:

That is very true, but I didn't get a chance to catch the game. But for what it sounds like, we still have a ways to go. IMO, defense is the best offence.

By Blogger Kamdrin, at 11:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Sunday, September 06, 2009

War Eagle

Well, we had a pretty nice victory over LA Tech yesterday. However, this did not come without some worries. Firstly, I think our offense started off quite slowly but really picked up the pace. This can prove to be a huge advantage over some of our more difficult competitors who traditionally start out very strong and then lose steam. Secondly, I think our defense was mostly a big disapointment (with the exception of that interception and a few other nice plays).

We had a few bullshit calls by the ref, a pass interference for an uncatchable catch to name one. We also had some really awesome game statistics for a first game and for our freshmen players. We saw that having two quarterbacks in the backfield proves two things: 1) Reinstates why Kodi Burns is not starting QB, 2) keeps the defense guessing which one is going to throw the ball. If they really iron out this technique, we can be a very strong team.

Finally, I think we have a lot of colors on the palette but we have found only 2 or 3 that we know to be good. This worked for LA Tech, but will it work against the other teams that have a full palette? My worry is that if we don't reinvent our team further, we won't be able to compete with the big boys in the SEC. We will see next weekend!

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Thursday, August 27, 2009

FDIC Worries Grow

Today the FDIC held a public press conference to address some questions about the 2nd Quarter Earnings Report (which mostly focused on losses). They started off by telling us that overall the Banking Institutions have lost $3.7 billion dollars. Then they told us that they had to put more "
Special Assessments" into the DIF to keep people from panicking. Then they went on to say that everything is okay, because we can just borrow $500 billion from the Treasury.

Now, if an instition were Solvent - i.e. able to pick itself up by the bootstraps - then why would it need the Treasury to pick it up. This is no different than the Credit Crisis of last year, and now we are going to see a complete unraveling of the Banking instition, down to the very core -- the depositors.

We then see that Loan losses totaled $66.9 billion, which is roughly what I predicted they would be about a week ago. Net interest margins rose, but let's take a look at why. A net interest margin is basically the yield from a loan (the interest) less the expenses. For a toxic asset, the expenses are quite high, so your net interest margin would be a negative number. However, in an ideal world, you would want to have a pretty high net interest margin on each loan. The reason this number is going up is because the banks that ARE lending are making more money because the Fed is giving out money for next to nothing (0.5%). So of course they are making more money, as they were already making money at higher rates.

The worst news in my opinion is this: At the end of June, there were 416 insured institutions on the "Problem List," up from 305 on March 31. Ladies and gentlement, this is the mother of all bad news because we are already unable to prop up the failed banks that have failed thus far, how would we handle another 416? The news isn't great, and despite all of their rhetoric to try and instill confidence in the FDIC, I have not been fooled.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Saturday, August 22, 2009

The FDIC is insolvent

The FDIC is officially insolvent, and I will explain how I have come to this conclusion. According to a CNN article (http://bit.ly/HnU3d) the FDIC fund took a huge hit in 2008 ($35.1 billion) and has continued to sustain bombardements by more and more bank failures ever since. Since March 2009, the FDIC fund was reported to have roughly $13 billion in value. This is roughly a loss of $40 billion from Jan. 2008 to Mar. 2009 and if we look at the banks that failed throughout that period we can come up with roughly each bank averaging at about $1 billion in liabilities and future losses for insurance. There were about 40 banks that failed during that period.

However, and this is really important, since March of this year there have been nearly 60 banks that have failed with almost 1 bank failing each business day! At this rate there could easily be another 120 banks that will fail after today, and if the exponentially increasing rate is a trend then we could have almost 500 banks fail this year as the Head of the FDIC herself has already come out and said.

Now let's get back to the fund. Remember how we said that the fund only had $13 billion since March of 2009? Well if we have had 60 banks failing since then, and we have come to the conclusion that each bank has about $1 billion in liabilities and insurance losses, then we will have at least another $60 billion in losses to the fund before the beginning of the 3rd quarter (and that still gives us 2 more quarters to have the fund hit even further). Simple math speaking would put the fund at a negative balance of at least $47 billion.

What this means is that the FDIC has been having to borrow from private lenders for almost the entirety of this quarter. This means more liabilities and future losses because of the interest. The FDIC is most definitely insolvent, and my numbers are being very generous. We also have to remember that since March some very large banks have failed - (Colonial and Guaranty just to name a few).

It is very likely that we will see a repeat of the insurance corporations (like the FDIC) going bust this September like we saw last year with the Mortgage Insurers (Lehman, Fannie, Freddie etc). It wouldn't surprise me if Congress bails out the FDIC (afterall $47 billion is a drop in the bucket to congress). But the instability and fear that this will create in the consumer will be irreplaceable, and fall sales will likely take a tremendous hit.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

My Profile


Name: Drewry
Home: Auburn, Alabama, United States
About Me: I am a student at Auburn University. I am also a small business owner and entrepreneur. I enjoy ideas, and problem solving. However, this is all encompassing--as the world is full of problems that need solving and those solutions require ideas. Do not try to categorize me as you will fail, as I seek to discover a universe that is truly without limits.
See my complete profile

Archives
Drewry Morris © 2008-2009. All Rights Reserved.